<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Required Reading for Turbulent Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://generoche.net/blog/2008/03/required-reading-for-turbulent-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://generoche.net/blog/2008/03/required-reading-for-turbulent-times/</link>
	<description>The Times They Are A-Changin'</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 19:37:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gardner</title>
		<link>http://generoche.net/blog/2008/03/required-reading-for-turbulent-times/comment-page-1/#comment-35354</link>
		<dc:creator>Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generoche.net/blog/2008/03/17/required-reading-for-turbulent-times/#comment-35354</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this link, Gene. While I agree that institutions of higher education must seek and embrace transformation, I worry about the assessment-based commodification of higher ed that approaches like these imply (for me, anyway). The PPT slides at http://www.uwstout.edu/bpa/focus2010/guskinpp.pdf make the same case, and look an awful lot like the NCAT strategies I heard at the SCHEV/LTAC/ECVA-sponsored &quot;Learning By Design&quot; conference last fall. Yes, &quot;faculty-based&quot; sounds bad, the old bugaboo &quot;sage on the stage.&quot; Yes, &quot;student-centered&quot; sounds great, libertarian even. But the magic of truly transformative education won&#039;t fit quite so neatly into these categories, I think. And while technology can and must scale the reach of transformative educational experiences, no technology will matter much unless there are catalytic educational presences--faculty and students alike--within the experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this link, Gene. While I agree that institutions of higher education must seek and embrace transformation, I worry about the assessment-based commodification of higher ed that approaches like these imply (for me, anyway). The PPT slides at <a href="http://www.uwstout.edu/bpa/focus2010/guskinpp.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.uwstout.edu/bpa/focus2010/guskinpp.pdf</a> make the same case, and look an awful lot like the NCAT strategies I heard at the SCHEV/LTAC/ECVA-sponsored &#8220;Learning By Design&#8221; conference last fall. Yes, &#8220;faculty-based&#8221; sounds bad, the old bugaboo &#8220;sage on the stage.&#8221; Yes, &#8220;student-centered&#8221; sounds great, libertarian even. But the magic of truly transformative education won&#8217;t fit quite so neatly into these categories, I think. And while technology can and must scale the reach of transformative educational experiences, no technology will matter much unless there are catalytic educational presences&#8211;faculty and students alike&#8211;within the experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

